Friday, October 19, 2012

Unfortunate Attacks on the CPH Apocrypha

I was reading a blog the other day and the person was complaining about CPH publishing the Apocrypha and saying that they were abandoning the true theology of the Lutheran Fathers. That's weird. If you read most of the older Lutheran scholastics, they quote the Apocrypha a ton and highly value it, in spite of the fact that they do not consider it to be Scripture or capable of establishing the articles of the faith.  In fact, anyone who has spent a significant amount of time reading the Lutheran Fathers (particularly Gerhard) knows that they cite the Apocrypha with other Scriptures without making any (explicit) of a distinction.  I would also note that Walther preached on the Apocrypha and that many of the classical Lutheran liturgies makes reference to the Apocrypha or even quotes it.  The "Song of the Three Young Men" (part of the additions to Daniel) is contained in several traditional Lutheran liturgies.  Hence, all attacks on the publication by CPH of the Apocrypha reveal themselves to be highly ignorant of the Lutheran Fathers and the historic Lutheran liturgy.

1 comment:

  1. "Hence, all attacks on the publication by CPH of the Apocrypha reveal themselves to be highly ignorant of the Lutheran Fathers and the historic Lutheran liturgy."

    This is going further than your ("That's weird!") objection to the initial statement and your subsequent argument substantiates. A more valid conclusion based on your argument is that: "Hence, all attacks on the publication by CPH of the Apocrypha based on the complaint that CPH is abandoning the true theology of the Lutheran Fathers reveal themselves to be highly ignorant of the Lutheran Fathers and the historic Lutheran liturgy."

    It is possible that some attacks or criticisms about the CPH's publication of the Apocrypha that are not based on such a complaint could be valid.

    ReplyDelete